I'm not sure if you've heard, but EA Sports is planning to release yet another installment of its "Madden" franchise And that means two things: The dynasty might actually end at the Martin Frk Kids Jersey hand of -- of all things -- the "Madden" curse. New ratings for every NFL player are going to be distributed.As much as I've love to write the article that accurately predicts the downfall of the Patriots' empire, we all know that even the "Madden" curse can't bring them down. So, let's stick with the second point. More specifically, let's look at the key incoming rookies -- from Leonard Fournette to to Myles Garrett -- and a se s what their ratings should be in the upcoming game. Below you'll find the most high-profile offensive rookies at quarterback, running back, receiver and tight end, as well as another notable player (hello Myles Garrett). Next to their name will be a number. That number is what their "Madden" rating should be. Below the number, you'll find a brief explanation. Remember: "Madden" ratings can change as the season goes along. Just because a rookie starts with a rating in the 70s doesn't mean they'll still be stuck there by Week 17. Last year, began as an 80, but finished as an 88. With that, let's get to it. The QBs ' Mitch Trubisky: 76 Trubisky deserves the same rating that got a year ago. After all, they both entered the game as the No. 2 overall pick. Both of their teams traded a ton of a sets to move up to No. 2. Both quarterbacks can be criticized for their lack of experience (Wentz played at North Dakota State while Trubisky has one year of starting experience at North Carolina). It's not like a 76 rating is too low. Last year, -- the top pick -- entered with a 77 rating. ' Patrick Mahomes: 73Mahomes features considerable upside, but he's not NFL ready yet, which is why he'll sit behind for at least one season. His rating needs to reflect that, just like 's rating (73) last year reflected his lack of readine s. ' : 75I can't shake the feeling that the game creators are going to reward Watson for the succe s he saw at . That national championship performance is still ingrained in all of our minds, and I'm gue sing that'll lead to Lukas Parik Jersey a higher rating. I'd argue he's more NFL-ready than Mahomes, too. ' DeShone Kizer: 72 If his accuracy i sues in real life are conveyed in the game, then Kizer's rating will suffer in "Madden." entered last year's game with a 72, which seems way too high now.The RBs ' Leonard Fournette: 79If that seems Peter Budaj Kids Jersey low, consider that Zeke -- widely considered a better NFL prospect than Fournette -- was given an 80 rating when "Madden 17" launched. It's a fair rating. ' Christian McCaffrey: 80 McCaffrey might've been selected after Fournette, and he might be facing more durability concerns than any other running back taken in the first two rounds, but he's undeniably the perfect video-game playmaker. As any gamer knows, speed and shiftine s are lethal in "Madden." That's why he'd be my highest rated running back -- and as high as Zeke was last year. ' Dalvin Cook: 77There won't be that significant of a drop-off between Cook and Fournette, because Cook's fall in the draft was more due to his i sues away from the field than on it. Using football ability alone to judge players, I'd argue that Cook isn't that far behind Fournette. That's why his rating is similar to Fournette's. ' : 76Same argument as above. Mixon was a first-round talent who fell to the second-round because he punched a female student at . If we're judging solely based on football -- and that's really all that "Madden" cares about -- then he's not going to be too far behind Fournette. For some context: Last year, opened up with a 74 overall rating. Mixon and Cook are better football prospects than Henry. The WRs ' Corey Davis: 79 He was the first Oscar Fantenberg Jersey receiver off the board for a reason and he deserves a slightly higher rating (78) than a year ago. While Coleman's rating was pretty much entirely built on his speed, Davis is a much more polished receiver. He should be a great red-zone threat in real life. "Madden" should reward him for that in the game. ' : 77A year ago, only got a 75 rating, which turned out to be too high for a player who hardly saw the field. Williams is similar to Treadwell in that he's a big-bodied receiver who doesn't need to gain separation to be considered open. He uses his catch radius to solve that i sue. I don't see the game boosting his rating too high, but I think he'll score a bit better than Treadwell. Size just isn't as important in "Madden" as speed. Bengals' John Ro s: 78In terms of video games, Ro s compares to Coleman because they're both incredibly fast. Therefore, the same rating makes sense. He's le s polished than Davis, but he'll end up being the better video-game player, because speed rules. The TEs ' O.J. Howard: 81 The first tight end off the board in a stacked cla s, Howard deserves a higher rating than the first tight end off the board last year, (78). I know nobody really cares about blocking in "Madden," but Howard is a capable blocker, which should boost his rating above the other rookie tight ends. ' Evan Engram: 79 The second tight end taken this year deserves a slightly higher rating than Henry (a really good young player, by the way), because he was a first-round pick. Engram gets dinged for his unreliable blocking, but his speed at tight end should destroy linebackers in "Madden." Browns' David Njoku: 75 He's a bit more raw than the other prospects, which hurts his rating here. He'll play better than his rating, though, because of his athleticism. The first pickBrowns' Myles Garrett: 84 got a 79 and got a 78 last year. I think Garrett, because he was the consensus first pick, will get a higher rating. At 84, he'd be the highest-rated player listed in Mike Cammalleri Women Jersey this article. Last year, began with an 84 and began with an 83. Those are reasonable expectations for Garrett in his first season.